One big difference in family portrait photography in modern days is the absence of a photo-journalistic bent. While this term is all the rage in wedding photography it has all but been forgotten in family portraiture. It seems the public wants pictures at beautiful places where the image can be controlled to it's most appealing level. While I understand this and enjoy doing it I do feel the idea of house calls with the idea of photographing what is happening on a normal basis has definite place and value. When photographing at home small children are much more relaxed and natural. But the big reason I think it's a great way to do portraits is historical importance. I often reflect on the importance of portraits as visual milestones. With the home visit you add the visual of a family space. People like looking back and remembering where they lived. As a parent I like seeing photographs of my child playing with his toys or drawing. I want to remember those things that were unique to that time and place. I often tell parents thats it's hard being a portrait photographer because I'm competing with people that have a much better chance at taking a magical shot that marks time, space and development. The parents!
The downside of home shooting is the lack of control. With outside portraiture or studio portraits you can change your direction or the lights and improve your lighting situation. The home visit requires a different set of expectations on "quality". The idea is that exposure takes a back seat to emotion or things thats may prove more important in time. More photos of my visit to the Surles' home in the portrait folder. P.S. I love these people.
Comments